SecurityFocus BUGTRAQ Mailing List: BugTraqLink Number One Link Number One Link Number Two Link Number Two Link Number One Link Number One Link Number Two Link Number Two Entire Site Advisories Calendar Columnists Elsewhere Guest Feature Infocus Library Links Mailing Lists (all) -- BUGTRAQ -- FOCUS-IDS -- FOCUS-IH -- FOCUS-LINUX -- FOCUS-MS -- FOCUS-SUN -- FOCUS-VIRUS -- FORENSICS -- INCIDENTS -- PEN-TEST -- SEC JOBS -- SF NEWS -- VULN-DEV News Products Services Tools Vulns BUGTRAQ ARCHIVE [ Message Index ] [ Thread Index ][ Reply ] [ prev Msg by Date ][ next Msg by Date ] To: BugTraq Subject: Snort not backdoored, Sourcefire not compromised Date: Sep 22 2003 12:44AM Author: Martin Roesch Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <200309211556.h8LFuS5m076005@mailserver1.hushmail.com> It's come to my attention that some group is claiming to have broken into a Sourcefire server and backdoored the Snort source code. First things first, there is no backdoor in Snort nor has there ever been, everyone can relax. A shell server got compromised well over a year ago, but what these guys aren't telling you is that the network that it was on was not only logically separate from the rest of the sourcefire.com domain, it was also physically removed from it too (by about 23 miles, approximately the distance from the Sourcefire office to my basement). Yes, that's right, they busted into a shell server that was maintained on a physically separate network in my basement. That particular machine was maintained as a shell server for various people to log into so that we can have a sacrificial box to use to chat on IRC without having to worry about our real network getting compromised, and it has served its purpose well. While we do try to keep that system from suffering break-ins, we also realize that many IRC clients aren't exactly the most secure pieces of code in the world and sometimes there are problems in server code as well (like apache and sshd), so we put together servers like that one so that we can interact with people while minimizing the risks to the company's networks and servers. I thought this was fairly standard practice for many security companies, maybe I'm wrong. If you're wondering "how do you know the code isn't backdoored?", since we know that that server is an "at risk" server we're not in the habit of checking code into CVS from there. If that's not good enough for you, Snort has been through three code audits since March (one Sourcefire internal, two third-party external) and there are most definitively no backdoors in the code, nor were there any. Hope that clears things up. BTW, the sample code that they put into their little screed was nothing more than an update of the 'stick' program from 2001, not really anything to get worked up about. -Marty -- Martin Roesch - Founder/CTO Sourcefire Inc. - (410) 290-1616 Sourcefire: Enterprise-class Intrusion detection built on Snort roesch sourcefire com - http://www.sourcefire.com Snort: Open Source Network IDS - http://www.snort.org Want to link to this message? Use this URL: Disclaimer, Terms & Conditions About this List Featured Lists: ARIS Users bugtraq bugtraq-es bugtraq-french NEW bugtraq-jp firewalls focus-ids focus-ih focus-linux focus-ms focus-sun focus-unix-other focus-virus forensics forensics-es honeypots incidents libnet pen-test secevents secpapers secprog sectools secureshell security-basics security-management NEW securityjobs vpn vuln-dev webappsec Newsletters: sf-news ms-secnews linux-secnews [ more . . . ] Privacy Statement Copyright © 1999-2003 SecurityFocus